[Question #10817] Hiv
19 months ago
|
![]() |
Edward W. Hook M.D.
19 months ago
|
19 months ago
|
![]() |
Edward W. Hook M.D.
19 months ago
|
![]() |
Edward W. Hook M.D.
19 months ago
|
19 months ago
|
I just finished pep and im still kind of worried about the exposure I explained above. My question is If i do test negative in 6 weeks does that mean i wasn’t infected at all? I’m confused on how Transmission of hiv works. Please correct me if I’m wrong but in order to be able to transmit the virus you must first Be permanently infected right? So if I do test negative on my test can I assume I wasn’t infectious during the time I was taking pep? And if I was infectious I would have tested positive for HIV since the hiv Did permanently infect me right? What my main worry is that say since I was taking PEP and it prevented (ME) getting permanently infected and I tested negative. What if in that duration of time I was taking pep I somehow transmitted the Virus to somebody else? Is that possible? Or Do I have to be permanently infected in order To be able to Transmit it to someone thus Making my test positive if i was infectious does this sound right?. My understanding is that Pep prevents HIV permanently infecting the body with HIV. So if pep does prevent this does that mean the person taking Pep wasn’t able to even transmit the virus since it didn’t (PERMENTLEY INFECT THEM?) please elaborate and explain to me throughly on how this works. I don’t understand.
19 months ago
|
If I’m right if I do test negative then it would have been impossible for me to be able to transmit the virus to anybody since it didn’t permanently infect me.
And if I do test positive only then is there a chance I was able to transmit the virus correct?
19 months ago
|
![]() |
Edward W. Hook M.D.
19 months ago
|