[Question #11318] Clarification Please

Avatar photo
15 months ago
Myhusband had one more episode of hematospermia - my anxiety got the best of me & I turned to google.  I know the limits to posting here, but I am hoping for clarification around my situation & grace. Please review my previous post. Dr Hook says there is no association with hematospermia/STI. The internet very much says the opposite including urology clinic sites, which is alarming! I read 40% of these cases are due to infections/STI. After 2 months of nothing he had one more episode of this- light pink when ejaculating. (So 3 times total). His Dr ran standard urinalysis - said it was normal/no sign of infection, but still recommends urology.  Is this indicative of no STI? He has not cheated. He is an anxious man who will fixate (afraid of cancer) & things become psychosomatic for him. He thinks there is a lump on the base/shaft of his penis (I don’t notice it as something of concern), but it causes him to feel/rub the area. His dr said this could’ve caused the blood. He says MAYBE his pee had a burning sensation after coffee or something once and while, but since urinalysis no comment on it.  He wonders if he feels some pain sometimes by his pubic bone, but when he’s not thinking about it he doesn’t notice anything. I don’t want to minimize his worry. But these symptoms don’t seem to be there unless he is worried.I’m so afraid we have been passing something back and forth for 3 years. Ive read here about long-term monogamous couples having things come up so I don’t know what to believe.  Could he have developed STI related epidiymitis or prostatis this late in the game? 
Avatar photo
H. Hunter Handsfield, MD
15 months ago
Welcome back, but I have to note this is your sixth question revealing heightened concerns and obsession with details of testing and risk that really don't matter.

It is wrong that STIs are common causes of hematospermia. Having not looked at the scientific literature on this for several years, before answering this question I did a search of the medical literature on the causes of Hematospermia. I found about 10 articles. One small study from Italy several years ago described infection of any kind as a possible contributor -- and in that case, the bacteria found were staph and Ureaplasma -- and Ureaplasma is an entirely normal bacteria in the genital tract. Another from Israel, also almost a decade ago, found a few cases of men with herpes or chlamydia, but the patients were highly selected and there was no clear evidence that these actually were the cause of the bleeding.

As for your husband, there is no STI that might cause the problem that would not show up on standard urinalysis. It was entirely proper for his doctor to recommend evaluation by a urologist, but that's normal for every Hematospermia case and certainly does not imply an STI as the cause. And from your description, there is nothing in you husband's symptoms that suggest it either. My suggestion is that you get of his case, stop assuming or accusing him of having an STI, and let this go. You have nothing to be worried about.

HHH, MD
---
Avatar photo
15 months ago
Thank you for taking the time to do extra research.  I have a few follow up questions: 

1) what in urinalysis could indicate STI? Everything was negative (including leukocytes & nitrites), and microscopy said “occasional” epithelial cells & mucous “present”.  His PCP said no sign of infection based on that….?  I assume some mucous can be normal…? Sounds like in your career you haven’t seen hematospermia in STIs? 

2) what are the chances that my chlamydia/gonorrhea testing at 6 days and two weeks post exposure PLUS oral test at 10 days post exposure would not pick up an infection? My concern is that we have given it back and forth for 3 years somehow.

3) I also had a health baby/pregnancy since that encounter - should that give me encouragement? 

4) what are common symptoms of Gon/Chlam in women? I have had external/vulvar itching a few times in the past year that subsided with monistat cream.  I also had spotting a couple times recently but my dr feels that is related to hormonal shifts after ovulation/crazy stress I have been under.  And this is after 3 years since my encounter. 

Dr, I’m honestly just praying that my obsession and guilt is not allowing me to think logically that my testing was accurate and I did not give him an STI that has stuck around this long.  I appreciate any last reassurance, so that I can try to relax and trust that my life won’t blow up when he goes to the urologist in several weeks. 
Avatar photo
15 months ago
I should add as a reminder that the precious few encounters 4-5 years ago I were unprotected and I have always tested negative.  And the most recent three years ago I gave unprotected oral and protected intercourse (I believe we had the condom on for all except a few seconds)…. This is why I tested vaginally twice and orally at 10 days post. 
Avatar photo
15 months ago
**clarification:  itching was a few instances in the last few years…
Avatar photo
H. Hunter Handsfield, MD
15 months ago
1) Normally collected (midstream) urine specimens usually show no abnormality in people with any STI. When STI is suspected, an initial specimen (the first ounce or less) sometimes shows elevated WBC.

2) There is no realistic possibility that these tests missed a chlamydial infection.

3) Neutral information:  most babies born to women with chlamydia or other STIs are entirely healthy.

4) The main symptoms -- in women who have symptoms at all -- are increased or abnormal vaginal discharge, vaginal spotting (sometimes noticed after sex), and sometimes painful or urgent urination, i.e. similar to non STD UTI symptoms. However, chlamydia rarely persists as long as 3 years anyway.

I agree exactly with your premise, that your "...obsession and guilt is not allowing [you] to think logically that [your] testing was accurate and [you] did not give him an STI that has stuck around this long."

I'm going to conclude this discussion. Please note -- as you may have been advised previously -- that repeated questions on the same topic are not permitted, especially when anxiety driven. The answers will never change so there is no point in asking again about any of these things. This will have to be your last; future questions on these topics and your inflated fears will receive no reply and the posting fee will not be refunded. This policy is based on compassion, not criticism, and is intended to reduce temptations to keep paying for questions with obvious answers. In addition, experience shows that continued answers tend to prolong users' anxieties rather than reducing them. Finally, such questions have little educational value for other users, one of the forum's main purposes. Thanks for your understanding. 

I do hope this final discussion has been helpful. I also suggest professional counseling -- but you know that so I won't dwell on it further. But I do hope you take the suggestion seriously. Goodbye and best wishes to you.
---
---