[Question #1164] Q#1104 follow-up - Please help!!
96 months ago
|
Edward W. Hook M.D.
96 months ago
|
Jonathan, your anxiety is leading you astray and searching the internet is a perfect way to find misleading and incorrect information. These experiences are behind you and you need to more on, You do not even know that your exes even had hepatitis. Further, you are misinterpreting the data you have found:
1. This study is more than 11 years old. If you read the abstract you'll see that the study was performed on people ONLY AFTER excluding people who had major risks for hepatitis such as transfusions and injection drug use. After exclusion of this group in whom hepatitis is most common, only about 1 in 10 people with the infection acknowledged being shaved in a barbershop only increasing the risk for infection modestly in scientific terms. For a person in the real world this study has little relevance.
2. You are over-reading this paper, published in a minor journal that I have never heard of as well. You do not live in India or Kuwait where the authors consider barber exposures to be at risk
3. Sigh, because young children are exposed to their parents in virtually every way imaginable.
I do not mean to be harsh but your anxiety is taking you off track. Not all scientific publications are fault free or high quality. I can find you articles published in the literature which suggest that mosquitoes transmit HIV too but this is just not scientifically credible. Without sounding arrogant, you asked for an expert opinion and I provided one based on over 35 years of Infectious Diseases practice. If you chose to believe the internet sources you have found, that is you privilege. If you chose to believe it, similarly, I am not sure what you are going to do about it - you have already told me that you do not want to talk with your family about this. My sincere and heartfelt advice is to urge you not to worry and to move forward without concern. My opinion and advise is unchanged. EWH
96 months ago
|
96 months ago
|
Edward W. Hook M.D.
96 months ago
|
Sigh, you now quote yet another obscure journal and pick out the parts that feed your insecurities - this is not good use of your time and does you no meaningful good for all of the reasons I have tried (clearly unsuccessfully) to explain. The paper you quote celebrates successes in reducing hepatitis transmission by interventions which reduce major routes of transmission (i.e. needle sharing, sexual transmission) and states that the remaining transmission now occurs increasingly through minor transmission routes such as "beauty treatments" using improperly sterilized equipment and this leads you to assume that this means your household is now infected with the virus.
One final comment, as we have learned long ago from the HIV epidemic, when people are surveyed about risks which may involve socially unacceptable activities such as injection drug use or unprotected sex, they tend to under report them. I suspect that this sort of mis-reporting too contributes to the small proportion of transmission that you are fixated on.
I really have nothing more to say. EWH
96 months ago
|
Edward W. Hook M.D.
96 months ago
|
I'm sorry, I should have said this before. This site is dedicated and exists to provide expert opinion and advice, based on our combined more than 70 years of practice, study of the medical literature and attendance at medical meetings and advisory meetings. It is not meant to serve to interpret the medical literature or interpret obscure data for readers who are engaged in anxiety driven internet sources. This note will end this exchange and the thread will be closed in a few hours. EWH