[Question #11970] Risk
11 months ago
|
Do bar pickups have a higher likelihood of having HIV or any other STDs than massage parlor CSWs, even massage parlor CSWs with any non-STD genital infections? For example, massage parlor CSWs with jock itch? Thank you.
![]() |
Edward W. Hook M.D.
11 months ago
|
Welcome to the Forum. Thanks for your question. I can only answer with generalizations however, massage partner CSWs, as a generalization, have a vested interest in making sure they are not infected and tend to take precautions to avoid STIs or, through regular check ups, get checked regularly to permit rapid treatment if they become infected. As a result, their risk for STIs, including HIV are likely to be lower than an impulsive, potential risk taking partner who may not take precautions and may be less likely to get regular check ups. Remember, massage partner CSWs are professionals and infecting partners is bad for business since clients know where to find them if they want or need to see them again. OTOH, you may never see a casual partner again. These generalizations apply to all genital infections.
A strategy for avoiding infections is to ask partners, CSW or otherwise regarding their STI history- i.e. do they have know STIs, do they get checked regularly, are they taking HIV PrEP. Most people will tell the truth is asked in a non-judgmental way
---I hope that this information is helpful. EWH
11 months ago
|
Thank you for your response. To clarify my question: do bar pickups have a higher likelihood of having HIV or any other STDs than massage parlor CSWs that are infected with jock itch? Thank you.
![]() |
Edward W. Hook M.D.
11 months ago
|
Sorry if you did not understand my reply- yes, bar pickups have a higher likelihood of having HIV or any other STDs than massage parlor CSWs that are infected with jock itch. For the reasons explained above. EWH---