[Question #12800] Hiv

Avatar photo
5 months ago
Greetings sir, I suspected a potential exposure after which the call girl I was with tested negative for hiv on rapid card test using veinous blood after 90 days, she also tested negative on 4th gen test after 100 days, I myself tested negative on 4th gen test after 16th,  33rd, 45th and 93rd day, hiv rna pcr limit of detection 90copies/ml on 16th and 33rd day, antibody rapid card test on 93rd day, is it safe to assume that there was no risk for hiv and i did not need to take any test. How accurate if the case was for india?
Avatar photo
H. Hunter Handsfield, MD
5 months ago
Welcome back, but I don't understand the reason. I see nothing here that wasn't addressed in the replies to your previous question a few days ago. Is there something in that discussion you din't understand?

Ah -- now I see your closing question. Of course there is no difference from any country to another in the risks for HIV, the need for testing, or the reliability of any HIV test. 

Anything else? (But please do not ask me to repeat or confirm anything covered in your previous thread or this reply.)

HHH, MD
---