You have greatly overestimated the risk of HIV in this situation. First, the chance your partner has HIV probably is low. Even if she does, the average risk of catching the virus is under one chance in 2,000 for a single episode of vaginal sex with an infected female partner. If we assume a 1% chance your partner had HIV (which probably is far too high), plus three exposures, the likelyhood you would have been infected was under one chance in half a million. (Let me know if you need help with my calculation.)

Perhaps most important to reassure you, the clinic was absolutely right about the PCR test and its reliability. That test detects 100% of infections any time after 11 days. No matter how high the risk of HIV at the time of exposure, your test results prove you were not infected. You could have told me you mainlined blood from a person known to have HIV:  my reply would be the same.

In other words, yes:  you definite are clear of HIV. Stop worrying and don't have any more HIV tests!

That said, you might want to consider a urine test for gonorrhea and chlamydia; the risk of these is far higher than for HIV. And maybe also have a syphilis blood test when you reach 6 weeks after the event. You can expect negative results.

I hope these comments are helpful. Let me know if anything isn't clear.

Being uncircumcised doubles the risk of HIV if sexually exposed. But you have to be exposed; and even then, double risk is pretty meaningless. Look at it this way:  if the risk of HIV from a particular exposure is one in a million, as yours probably is, then being uncircumcised means the risk becomes one chance in 500,000. That's still zero for all practical purposes.

OK?

I understand that you and Dr Hook have never been wrong with a single analysis regarding HIV in the 21 years of your forums, therefore this is very comforting.

Thanks for the thanks. I'm glad to have helped. Take care and stay safe.