[Question #13278] Handjob scare

Avatar photo
25 days ago

I received a handjob (only that, no fluid exchange) from a Chinese CSW 28 days ago. I didn’t notice any lesions on her hands, arms, or torso. Thanks to a user on ASHA Inspire who replied to my concern (link) and redirected me here, I’ve read many of your responses and understand hand-genital contact is extremely low risk for syphilis.

A few hours after the encounter, she kindly sent me a photo of her palm—no visible signs of rash or lesions. I know you can’t evaluate photos, but I don’t see anything suspicious.

I’ve had no symptoms on my glans or shaft at all. I plan to test on August 1st (CLIA or EIA in an STI center, possibly with titer and immunoblotting). Questions:

1. If she had an undetected secondary rash, how risky was the contact?

2. Is 28 days without symptoms clinically reassuring?

3. Would my test on day 31 be conclusive?

I’m struggling to find peace and truly hope a reply from one of the top experts may help bring me mental relief.


Avatar photo
Edward W. Hook M.D.
24 days ago
Welcome to our Forum.  Thanks for your questions.  I’ll be glad to comment.  Receipt of masturbation is a no risk event for all STIs with exceptional exceptions.   The exception would be he presence of an open, weeping lesion of an ulcerative STI such as syphilis or herpes.    Even if such a lesion were present, the risk of infection is very low.  In your case with no lesion present ( it would have been obvious), the event was no risk with no need for concern or testing.  In response to your specific questions:

1.  See above.  The risk with a non ulcerative rash is close to zero.
2.  Yes.  In the case of syphilis, a primary lesion would have appeared by now.
3.  In exposed persons ( there is no evidence you were exposed), blood tests for syphilis are entirely conclusive at six weeks.

From everything you say, you really have nothing to worry about.  I hope my comments will help you to move forward.  EWH
---
Avatar photo
24 days ago

Dr. Hook,
First of all, thank you very much for your reply. I truly appreciate your time and expertise.

Due to the character limit in the original question, I wasn’t able to give some useful background. The CSW has been working in Italy for several years, where STI testing is completely free in public hospital-based clinics. So she has every opportunity to monitor her sexual health. Also, she is still actively working. These facts significantly reduce the chance that she had an active STI at the time—especially something as visible as a secondary syphilis rash, which I assume would rarely go unnoticed.

Before posting here, I had already contacted the national helpline of the Istituto Superiore di Sanità (Italy's top public health authority), and they told me: “If she had anything infectious on her hands, you definitely would have noticed.” I also spoke with a physician from an Italian STI NGO who said: “The risk is extremely low, but to be extra cautious, avoid sex with your partner and take a treponemal test after 4 weeks.”

Avatar photo
24 days ago

Because I received slightly mixed messages, I decided to ask here—where the world’s top STI experts provide clear, experience-based guidance. Your reply was very reassuring and helpful, and I thank you again.

That said, I hope it’s okay if I ask a few brief follow-up questions:

I scheduled a test on August 1st (31 days post-contact) before leaving for vacation with my wife and children. Given the near-zero risk, absence of symptoms, and the fairly high sensitivity of CLIA/EIA tests at 4–5 weeks, would that test reasonably provide closure?

Dr. Handsfield once said: “Some asymptomatic cases of newly acquired syphilis have no chancre at all.” Is it possible to have primary syphilis without any signs, or was he referring to mild or unnoticed chancres? Could completely silent primary syphilis happen only in immunosuppressed individuals? I’ve checked myself daily due to anxiety.

Lastly: due to mild phimosis, my glans stays covered. If infected, would a chancre appear on the shaft/glans, not the inner foreskin?

Your reply brought me real peace of mind.

Avatar photo
Edward W. Hook M.D.
24 days ago
I’m glad I could help.  

I agree that your 31 day test will be sufficient to permit closure.

I believe Dr. Handsfield’s statement was referring to persons who may not notice a primary syphilis lesion and that had you acquired syphilis you would have developed a lesion.

I think you are worrying more than you need to.

On follow up remaining. EWH
---
Avatar photo
20 days ago
Dear Dr. Hook,

I just wanted to share a quick follow-up and thank you once again.

Yesterday I had my STI consultation and blood draw at the Florence public IST center. The physician there confirmed what you’ve said: that while transmission through hand-genital contact is theoretically possible, in real clinical practice it’s virtually unheard of, and would only be a concern in the presence of an obvious, active primary syphilitic lesion—which was clearly not the case in my situation.

Today I received my results: negative for syphilis total ab (clia method).

As you told me, with this I can finally close this chapter.

Your clear explanations, clinical experience, and reassurance helped me escape a difficult spiral of anxiety and fear. I’m truly grateful for the time and knowledge you shared.

With deep thanks,

RB.
Avatar photo
Edward W. Hook M.D.
20 days ago
Thanks for your thanks and sharing your test results.  Seeing them will be helpful to other visitors to our Forum.  I'll close the thread now. Take care   EWH---