[Question #1364] Very Worried
97 months ago
|
97 months ago
|
Edward W. Hook M.D.
97 months ago
|
Welcome to our Forum. I will be glad to comment on your questions. Let me first comment on the risk related to the exposures you describe and then on your test results. Statistically, it is unlikely that your partner had HIV; despite the fact that your partner was a commercial sex worker, most CSWs do not have HIV. Even if she did, from your description I would classify your exposures as being essentially no risk for HIV. If your condom was intact during vaginal sex and the condom was used throughout the exposure this was a no risk exposure. Further irrespective of whether a condom was used for receipt of oral sex, there are no proven cases of HIV acquired from receipt of oral sex. Finally, contact of your partner's genital secretions with your thigh was also a no risk event- HIV is not spread through contact of non-mucosal (i.e. genital, rectal or oral) skin with infected secretions- it is for this reason that mutual masturbation with an infected partner is also considered a no risk event. Thus if you had asked me if you needed testing related to this exposure, I would have told you there is no need for testing.
As for your test results, at 37 days a 3rd generation HIV test would detect well over 90% of recent HIV infections. If the test was a 4th generation test, it would have been conclusive at 4 weeks. In your case, since you also had a negative HIV PCR at 44 days, you should consider your tests to be conclusive - you did not get HIV from the exposures you have described. Also, there is no need for further testing and no need for testing for HIV-2. My advice is to be confident that you did not get HIV and to move forward without concern. EWH
97 months ago
|
Edward W. Hook M.D.
97 months ago
|
Your PCR will be negative. When it is, you should accept that you did not get HIV from what I have told you was a NO RISK event. Further, as I told you earlier, you DO NOT need HIV-2 testing of any sort. This would be a waste of time and money.
Finally, I strongly recommend AGAINST blood tests for HSV-2 in this situation. If you had gotten herpes you would have developed lesions within two weeks of your exposure. you have not! Your chances of having a false positive result are much higher than anything else. The exposure you described did not put you at meaningful risk for HSV-2. EWH
96 months ago
|
Edward W. Hook M.D.
96 months ago
|
HIV-2 is found almost entirely in West Africa and even there is is only a small proportion of all HIV infections. Current generation HIV 1/2 tests would have detected over 90% of HIV-2 infections at 37 days when you were last tested. The chance that your sex partner in the DR had HIV-2 is extraordinarily low. Testing at this time is not a good use of your time or money. You are far more likely to be hit by lightening today than to have HIV-2. Similarly for you to continue to worry is not justified.
My advice is to relax and move forward with your life.
This is my 3tdf and final reply to your questions. This thread will be close later tonight. EWH