[Question #13786] Ureaplasma
|
18 days ago
|
Today, I received isolated and abnormal results for ureaplasma species. I was prescribed 14 days of doxycycline. All my other std testing was negative. I went to get tested due to some slight mostly clear (one time cloudy) discharge coming from my penis. The discharge went away within a couple of days. I experienced similar symptoms about 18 months prior; however, at that time, all my tests were negative (inclusive of ureaplasma). I should note that the head of my penis does get irritated at times as I believe it the ph from one partner's vagina is causing this. I went 18 months feeling fine until about a week ago. I feel fine now - with the exception of some lower back pain. I've read on this forum that ureaplasma is of no real concern. Can you explain? Does it go away on its own? Is it a normal bacteria?
I have two regular partners. Can you tell me more about ureaplasma and if it's necessary to inform my partners? Should I take the doxycycline? If so, should I retest afterwards? If I don't tell my partners, take the doxycycline, then won't I pick the ureaplasma back up? I'm just very concerned for my health and my partners. I don't know how I acquired the ureaplasma. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for your help.
|
Edward W. Hook M.D.
18 days ago
|
Welcome back to the Forum. The discharge you experienced may or may not have been non-gonococcal urethritis (NGU). Chlamydia is the most common cause of NGU causing about 30-40% of NGU. Mycoplasma genitalium causes another about 10% of NGU. Both are considered STIs which can lead to complications and which warrant treatment. Non-chlamydia, non-MG NGU is not clearly a process that requires treatment as it does not appear to cause complications. Research done in the 1970s initially suggested that ureaplasma caused some NGU as well however with continued study, this belief has been disproved. It is now understood that Ureaplasma is normally present in the genitourinary tract and not a pathogen. Further, treatment of NGU is typically unsucessful as it decreases in concentration and then recurs over time without re-exposure. The persistence of the misunderstanding regarding Ureaplasma as an STI has persisted and is fostered by the continued availability of tests for Ureaplasma despite the fact that it is not a pathogen.
I hope all of this makes sense. It's complex. You may have had non-chlamydial, non-MG NGU, a syndrome which does not require treatment, nor notification of partners. EWH
---|
18 days ago
|
Since all my testing was negative and ureaplasma is normal in the tract, is it safe to resume sexual activity? I am afraid of infecting a partner. Does ureaplasma appear and reappear or is it always there? Is all ureaplasma normal? The test just said ureaplasma species. Do most individuals have this?
I did not have it 18 months ago. The doctor said it was an std since I didn't have it last test but I have it now. He was unclear on the dosage of doxycycline....he said seven days but if symptoms don't improve, then to take the full 14. But I don't have any discharge from my penis and I feel fine with the exception of back pain. He said after completing the antibiotics, that I don't need to retest. Would taking the doxycycline clear the ureaplasma? Prior to this, the only discharge episode was 18 months ago, which Dr. Handsfield attributed to the possibility of the ph in my partner's vagina (I am still with her today). An 18 month gap in discharge is just baffling to me. Is there a possibility for reccurence?
With the exception of gonorrhea 25 years ago, I have luckily always tested negative for stds until today. Since all my testing was negative, ureaplasma is normal in the tract, and if you are attributing the discharge to non-mgen and non-chlamydia ngu.....then I'm assuming it's safe to resume sexual activity, correct? What about if one partner has ureaplasma and another doesn't? I don't want to pass this along to anyone. Going forward, I'm guessing it is safe to just order the basic std testing rather than a 'comprehensive' one. I appreciate your help, Dr. Hook. Your advice has been helpful for several years going back to the former website. Any further advice is greatly appreciated.
|
Edward W. Hook M.D.
18 days ago
|
Ureaplasma can certainly come and go and can be shared between partners but as such does not cause complications.
Your doctor has a misunderstanding about Ureaplasma, a problem which is unfortunately relatively common.
I agree that it is OK to resume unprotected intercourse with your regular partner(s).
I would agree that so-called comprehensive testing is rarely needed and often creates confusion as has been the case for you. I would not worry. EWH
---|
4 days ago
|
I appreciate your help, Dr. Hook. Just for reference, it was uu and this was done at an urgent care facility. I opted not to take the doxycycline. Per your feedback, my worries are pretty much alleviated. I realize you need to close this thread out, but can you just explain briefly how ureaplasma can come and go? I realize more that ureaplasma is normal in the tract but was just curious on that point. Regarding 'comprehensive' testing, it does seem like it causes quite a bit of confusion. I'll know now just to go standard, but would you recommend to include mgen as well? Once again, thank you very much for your help.
|
Edward W. Hook M.D.
4 days ago
|
Thanks for your thanks. I agree with your decision to not take antibiotics and am please your concerns have declined. Thanks for the follow up.
Your question is a good one. The levels of normal bacteria at mucosal surfaces tend to fluctuate from high to low levels normally. When ureaplasma is treated ( in error as explained above), levels then go down but then recover, sometimes after a period when they are undetectable. When baseline levels are low there can be variability in detection, perhaps due to sampling variation.
---As you point out, with this 3rd reply this thread is now complete and will be closed shortly. Take care. EWH
