[Question #1698] Is this Syphilis?
91 months ago
|
Edward W. Hook M.D.
91 months ago
|
Welcome to our Forum. I'll be glad to comment. You can be confident at this time that you did not get any STI, including HIV from the exposure 14 weeks ago. Your test results for all STIs- gonorrhea, chlamydia, HIV and syphilis now provide reliable proof that you were not infected and there is no need for further testing. I will provide a little more information to you below providing some background and rationale for my statement but the bottom line is that you can be confident you were not infected through the exposure you mention and you can now move forward without concern.
By way of background, getting STIs of any sort from receipt of oral sex is rather uncommon. There has never been a case of HIV shown to be acquired from receipt of oral sex, and both syphilis and chlamydia are VERY rarely acquired in this way. From time to time persons may acquire gonorrhea or non-gonococcal urethritis but this is also relatively uncommon- most people do not have STIs to transmit and in those who do, only a minority of exposures to infected persons lead to infection. Further, in your case, if you had gonorrhea, chlamydia, NGU or syphilis from this exposure, the azithromycin and doxycycline you took would have cured them.
Also, the symptoms you describe (conjunctivitis, possible incomplete emptying of your bladder and pain AFTER urination are not STI symptoms. I suspect the conjunctivitis is an unrelated problem and the urinary symptoms may reflect prostate problems but again, certainly NOT STI.
I hope this information is helpful to you. Take care. EWH
91 months ago
|
91 months ago
|
Edward W. Hook M.D.
91 months ago
|
Correct, you should believe your RPR results. You do not have syphilis and there is no reason to be worried about this going forward. Your exposure was low risk for syphilis, you have not developed signs or symptoms of syphilis (no matter what the internet tells you), and you have a highly reliable lab test with almost no false negaitv4e tests at this time which confirms that you did not acquire this rare disease.
As I said earlier, the symptoms you are experiencing are not suggestive with an STI of any sort. Prostate-related, non-STI problems are a possibility as is CPPS. Also, as you acknowledge, your anxiety (and I suspect guilt) over your exposure appears to have contributed to a heightened sense of awareness of sensations and possible symptoms which contribute to your concerns. Again, I can assure you, this is not an STI. Perhaps my statement to this effect will help you to move forward. If not, I suggest you discuss this with a urologist and consider discussing your concerns with a trusted, confidential counselor. EWH
91 months ago
|
91 months ago
|
Edward W. Hook M.D.
90 months ago
|
There is no good evidence that UU is an STD, as opposed to an organism the colonizes the genital tract. As for M. genitalium, there is no evidence that it is an important pathogen transmitted through oral sex. I would not worry.
This is my third reply to your questions, thus this will end this exchange and the thread will be closed later today. EWH