I'm writing because I've had a series of confusing herpes results and I was wondering if I could get some clarity. 

It all started December of 2014, I had what appeared to be a genital ulcer, not your typical herpes blisters. It was painful when I urinated. The doctors office did a culture and it was positive for HSV1. However, no oral sex was had with my partner at the time. He took a blood test and showed positive for HSV1 and HSV11. I took valcylovir and it cleared up.  I had no other breakouts, but continued to take suppressive therapy because I feared passing it on.  I had a blood test done in July 2015 and it showed negative. I thought the negative result may have been due to the medication. In may of 2016 after sexual intercourse with a condom I developed another small ulcer. It wasn't as painful as the last episode, but I went to the doctor two days later, had a culture done and it came back negative. Later in may 2016 I had another blood test done. I was off the medication at this point, the blood test was positive for HSV1. I have not had another episode of ulcers since. I had accepted that I had the virus and stayed off the medication from July 2016-Jan 2017. Now I have a new partner and went to get all STD testing done once again. I started seeing my new partner in January of 2017 just four weeks ago. At this time I started the valcyclovir again to avoid transmission, so I've only been on it for about 4-5 weeks. As of today 2/6/17, my IGG blood test came back negative for both HSV1 and 2. I'm so confused by all of these results. Can the use of valcylovir for the last 4-5 weeks affect my blood test results, two years later? My doctor advised me that I do not have HSV, and does not advise any further testing. Is this an accurate conclusion, or should I assume I have it and get retested without any medication in my system at a later date? Please help, and thank you in advance. (btw - i don't have any information on viral loads etc. it just says