[Question #2798] Unprotected Oral Please Help
94 months ago
|
![]() |
Edward W. Hook M.D.
94 months ago
|
Welcome to the forum. Thank you for looking at earlier posts and for your confidence in our advice and assistance. You are correct that receipt of oral sex is a relatively low risk exposure in terms of risk for sexually transmitted infections and there is no risk from receipt of massage, or masturbation. You are likewise correct that any symptoms you are experiencing at the present time are most likely due to anxiety and certainly do not reflect symptoms related to any STI acquired at the encounter you describe. Finally the assurance you received from the masseuse that they are regularly checked for STI & HIV is likely to be true and if that is the case, it also makes your risk for any STI from us and counter quite low.
Low risk however is not no risk and given your concerns over the exposure it is probably reasonable to be tested, at least for the most common STI's, at some point in the not-too-distant future. The most important STI & AIDS to test for would be gonorrhea and chlamydia both of which can occasionally be acquired through receipt of oral sex ( The risk for chlamydia is much much lower than the risk for gonorrhea. ). You could have a urine test for gonorrhea and chlamydia performed at any point more than three days after your exposure and if these tests are negative as I expect they will be, you can be completely confident that you were not infected at this exposure. There is no risk for HIV from any of the activities you describe and the risk for syphilis is vanishingly low. If you acquire syphilis it will be apparent As an open sore or lesion occurring at the site of exposure. (Your penis).
I hope my comments for reassuring to you. Your risk for infection is low and if I were you I would not be worried. EWH
---
94 months ago
|
Hey Doc,
Thanks for your prompt response. Your advice is well taken and makes me feel less worried than I would have been. 2 days after, and I don't feel anything odd still.
I have a few followups regarding your advice. I do plan to have myself looked at for C and G after the time span you elaborated. However, being in the 3rd world, I don't think the centers I have access to do the urine culture you suggested. When I had myself tested before, I think they assessed infection via routine blood and urine tests, combined with symptoms/history, and assigned antibiotics if doctors felt the need. Are these enough for my purposes? There's also the gram stain, which I've also tried. I dunno if results from these would satisfy you and hope for your input here about their sufficiency.
Also happy to hear about my no-risk and 'vanishingly low' risk of HIV and syphilis, respectively. Do these mean that you advise I not test for these anymore? And if you still think I do, when's the best time in your opinion, given my level of risk (I recently tested neg for both a little before this encounter)? Lastly, if by some weird chance I get put on an antibiotic routine like doxycycline, would these knock out any potential syphilis along with the rest?
Sorry for so many questions, but out of respect for your time and mine, I want my last entry to just be about sharing results/final thoughts. I know you deal with a lot of nervous wrecks and I don't want to be that. I look forward to your advice and hope to implement them ASAP.
![]() |
Edward W. Hook M.D.
94 months ago
|
Thank you for the additional information about testing. It's for gonorrhea and chlamydia are of no usefulness. Culture tests are somewhat less sensitive than PCR cut costs but they are useful and in your situation if negative would prove that you were not infected.
We recommend against unwarranted antibiotics without proof of infection. Particularly in very very low risk situations such as yours. Medicines have side effects May cause their own sorts of complications. A medicine like doxycycline taken for two weeks would illuminate the possibility of syphilis, cure chlamydia if present and bite cure about half of cases of gonorrhea. Despite that as noted above we do not recommend it. EWH
---
94 months ago
|
Dear Dr. Hook,
As you advised, I had myself checked out yesterday by my doctor for the infections indicated. No sign of infection was found and my doctor did not find anything remarkable about my physical condition. We also had a long talk about risks and how to process my experiences about what happened and to move on from it. I would like to thank you also for the advice you gave me. Almost a week out and no symptoms still that I can't attribute to just worry.
I know you brought up both syphilis and HIV, and mentioned how I had very little risk for the former and none for the latter. My GP believes that the risks I had for both were virtually nil, and actually does not advise I go for anymore testing for that specific incident. Is that an assessment you are on board with? I could get myself tested for syphilis and get an antibody test along with it, but only if you think it's something I need to do with respect to my risk. If so, when can I have results I can be confident in?
Thanks again for your help, Doctor. I am trying to take steps to get my head fully back on track and your parting words will do wonders for that.
![]() |
Edward W. Hook M.D.
94 months ago
|
Thanks for your follow-up. It sounds like you had a good talk with your doctor, the sort of talk that I wish more people could have. I also agree with your doctor. I am quite comfortable with you not testing for syphilis or HIV related to the events you have described. At this time, it is reasonable and appropriate for you to move forward without concern. EWH
---
---