[Question #2800] Clarification on non-sexual exposure
94 months ago
|
![]() |
Edward W. Hook M.D.
94 months ago
|
94 months ago
|
Howdy Doctor Hook,
When I read your reply yesterday it really made me feel better. Thank you for that. When I woke up this morning I had a few lingering thoughts that I wanted to make sure I understood.
If my understanding of the transmission of HIV or other blood borne STIs is correct, even if my client had HIV and I did get his client's blood on my hands and this blood somehow got into a cut I may have had or my eyes, mouth, nose, ears, etc., this type of contact is simply not a viable route for transmission to occur and thus not something I need to worry about. I read in the forum that even a poke with an HIV+ needle that goes deep into someone's tissue is only a one in several hundred chance of transmission. Which means that contact with blood exposed to air that may get into a cut is just not a risk or if it is a risk it would be a one in a thousand or one in a million chance. Is this about right?
The only other thing concerning me is I have a few pimples on my face and what might be a coldsore on my lip and if my understanding of what you've written here and elsewhere is right, HIV+ blood contact with my pimples or coldsore is also not a risk for the same reasons I discuss above.
Lastly, is there a rule of HIV transmission I can keep in mind if these thoughts comes up again in a casual contact setting?
Much obliged for your expert advice
![]() |
Edward W. Hook M.D.
94 months ago
|