[Question #2976] STD transmission risk from ED syringe
93 months ago
|
Hello. Currently I use the shot or syringe (papaverine) for ED. When one uses the shot there is an immediate puncture, though I believe this closes up in a few minutes. My question is one I have not seen answered or even asked anywhere else. Basically, every medical provider says that there is increased likelihood of transmission of STIs if there is any cut or break in the skin. Does this mean using the shots for ED increases one risk? Or is the puncture too small to matter? Or does it close soon enough? I practice safe vaginal sex, I am mainly concerned about oral sex transmission through saliva or throat gonorrhea of the other person. Is it possible that the whole question is academic, since oral sex STI transmission is sufficiently low-probability to begin with? Thanks!
![]() |
H. Hunter Handsfield, MD
93 months ago
|
Welcome to the forum. Thanks for your question.
---
The elevated risk from a skin break refers only to HIV (or in theory, hepatitis B) and means that transmission risk is higher if a skin break is present when one is exposed to HIV. Usually this means a sexual exposure to an infected partner while having a cut or sore on the penis, e.g. herpes or something like that. Also, a skin injury or wound generally must be brand new and actively bleeding at the time of sexual exposure. Having had injections in the exposed area doesn't count. Theoretically the risk of syphilis might be elevated by such wounds, but there is no known increased risk for gonorrhea, chlamydia, etc.
You obviously should be having safe sex, i.e. choose your partners wisely and use condoms for vaginal or anal sex, and you are aware of the in herently low risk of oral sex for HIV/STD transmission. In the event you have an infected partner, having had a penile injection for ED would not increase the risk of any STD.
I hope this information is helpful. Let me know if anything isn't clear.
HHH, MD
93 months ago
|
Thank you, doctor, this is very clear. I did have a follow up about oral sex risks, especially regarding fellatio. Keeping in mind the risk either way is low, I have never seen anyone address the issue of whether (not to be too graphic) "deep throating" puts a man getting fellatio (having it performed on him) puts him at higher risk for, say, gonorrheal contraction (from throat of infected person, than getting a fellatio with no real penetration into the throat. I would also add, this concerning HIV, that while you and most medical professionals say that the risk very low for transmission through oral, some of us get confused by seemingly official websites like this one that pretty much say the opposite: http://www.positive.org/Home/faq/oral.html. This site, which is "sex positive" mind you, says this: "Fellatio (oral sex on a man) is considered an "unsafe" activity, meaning it involves a relatively high risk of HIV transmission."
![]() |
H. Hunter Handsfield, MD
93 months ago
|
Good question, but nobody knows. More prolonged, deeper, or more vigorous oral sex may elevate the risk, especially for STDs primarily carried in the back of the throat, such as gonorrhea and maybe HIV. But there are no data whatever -- just common sense and educated guesswork.
Sadly, many (most?) HIV/STD prevention resources don't adequately distinguish levels of risk. I don't know who is in charge of the webiste you mention, but CDC (as one major example) basically takes the position that if there is any risk at all, it is so labeled. Partly the idea is that it's safer to advice against any particular activity with any risk at all, rather than take the risk of people misinterpreting low risk as zero risk. But some agencies, and certainly on this forum, we pay close attention to the data and routinely advise about the differing risk levels. CDC itself has published data estimating the chance of HIV transmission by fellatio, if one partner is infected, as 1 chance in 10,000 penis to mouth and 1 in 20,000 in the opposite direction. Those numbers are equivalent to giving or receiving BJs by infected partners once daily for 27 years or 55 years before transmission might be likely. Accordingly, I strongly disagree with characterizing fellatio as "relatively high risk".
---
93 months ago
|
Thank you so much for the comprehensive replies!