[Question #3808] Reassurance question regarding 4th generation hiv test results
86 months ago
|
![]() |
H. Hunter Handsfield, MD
86 months ago
|
Welcome to the forum. Thanks for your question, and for doing substantial research on your concerns before asking. With one very minor exception, you got it all right.
---
There has never been a proved case of HIV transmission by oral sex, mouth to penis, and only a few in the other direction, i.e. penis to mouth/throat. Even here, if your partner had HIV, the average transmission risk was once calculated (by CDC) to be 1 in 10,000 if the penile partner had HIV. That's equivalent to giving BJs to infected men once daily for 27 years before catching HIV might be likely, and even that requires a) that the penile partner have HIV, b) that he not be on treatment for HIV, and c) ejaculation in the mouth. So this exposure was extremely low risk -- sufficiently low that testing was optional (recognizing of course that testing may still have value for reassurance).
As for test performance, you found exactly the right information. On this forum, we round off the definitive period for the Ag/Ab test ("4th generation") to 6 weeks, i.e. 3 days short of 45 days -- which undoubtedly makes no difference. We recently changed our advice from 4 to 6 weeks because of exactly the same report cited by CDC on their website. In any case, your negative result at 28 days was nearly conclusive and the 46 day result was 100% reliable.
So all is well and no need for further testing.
The "very minor exception" in your research: oral-penile sex is fellatio, and oral-vaginal is cunnilingus. Analingus means oral-anal contact -- which, if I correctly understand your question, you didn't have.
I hope this information is helpful. Let me know if anything isn't clear.
HHH, MD
86 months ago
|
Dr. Handsfield,
Thanks very much for your reply and insight. Your response regarding my hiv testing is very reasssuring, and If you believe no more testing is necessary, then I will move on from this experience.
Regarding my comment on analingus and my specific encounter. It indeed was oral to anal, I believe the term is also called rimming. From the research I did it seems as though this is a very low risk encounter as well.
Thanks for your expertise and advice. Once again, the service offered on this site is extremely helpful for those who need educated and reliable advice for some peace of mind and guidance.
Thanks again!
![]() |
H. Hunter Handsfield, MD
86 months ago
|
Sorry I misunderstood the nature of the contact. However, it doesn't significantly change my response. Although specific data don't exist on HIV transmission risk through analingus (rimming), but what we know of HIV risks and oral exposure in general suggests little or no risk. By far the greatest risk from analingus is for various gastrointestinal infections for the oral partner.
Thanks for the kind words about our services. I'm glad to have helped. Let me know if anything remains unclear.
---
86 months ago
|
Dr. Handsfield,
I appreciate your confirmation on the low risk nature of my exposure.
Since I have one more question i would like your thoughts one last thing. During the last couple of months since my encounter of concern i have visited my own personal physician, as well as asked opinions on a couple of websites like just answer regarding hiv testing result recommendations. Despite the avaialable data, current cdc guidlines, and the fact that specifically the 4th generation test has been available in the U.S. since 2010, many doctors still recommend to retest at 3 months “just to be sure”. What is the reason for this? The conflicting information undoubtedly is the reason for so many people having such high anxiety with the thought of having to wait so long for accurate results, even though this apparently isn’t necessary if 4th generation tests require only 6 weeks for definitive results.
I would think that after 8+ years of 4th gen test here in the US, there would be a bit more awareness amongst Physicians and HCP’s, but this doesn’t seem to be the case.
I know there is no perfect answer for this question, but if possible I would like your opinion.
Thanks, and take care.
![]() |
H. Hunter Handsfield, MD
86 months ago
|
This gets asked fairly frequently. There are no formal guidelines by CDC or most public health agencies that recommend a particular interval and to my knowledge no data exist on what proportion of physicians, clinics, etc advise testing at various intervals. For providers who still recommend 3 months as conclusive (sometimes even longer), I imagine some do it simply out of habit, since 3 months was the standard for so long. Others may not fully understand the newer tests. Still more may simply have a conservative perspective on such things -- and maybe there are even some who disapprove of their patients' sexual lifestyles and seek to encourage delayed resumption of behaviors they disapprove.
As you predicted, that's the third question and reply and so concludes this thread. I hope the discussion has been helpful. Best wishes and stay safe.
---