[Question #5961] STD risk Oral Sex / Non penetration

Avatar photo
71 months ago
Hello. Female here. 30. My question is, how likely are the chances of catching ANY std from a brief episode of giving fellatio and rubbing of genitals with no penetration? The fellatio lasted a few minutes, less than 5 and there was no ejaculation.  Given these circumstances, what is the likelihood of catching an std, oral or genital? STDs of concern, chlamydia, gonorrhea, trich, hiv, hepatitis, ngu, syphillis, really any and all? 
Avatar photo
H. Hunter Handsfield, MD
71 months ago
Welcome to the forum. Thanks for your question and your confidence in our services.

First, there's absolutely no risk of genital infection. STDs are not trasnmitted by hand genital contact and rarely by genital-genital contact without penetration. And STDs don't travel through the body to unexposed sites -- i.e. the oral event cannot lead to genital infection.

So the only part of this event of potential concern is the fellatio. And that's low risk for all STDs -- much lower risk than vaginal or anal intercourse, for example. Some STDs are more likely than others, namely gonorrhea, herpes, and HPV, but even these are uncommon. Chlamydia can infect the throat, but quite infrequently. Viral hepatitis extremely rarely. Trich doesn't take hold in the oral cavity -- no worries there. NGU due to normal oral bacteria is a potential risk for your partner, but of course not for you. Syphilis can be transmitted by oral-genital exposure, but syphilis currently is very rare in most heterosexual populations in the US. The average risk of HIV transmission, penis to oral if the penile partner has HIV, is roughly 1 in 10,000 -- which is equivalent to giving BJs to HIV infected men once daily for 27 years before transmission might be likely -- and assuming your partner wasn't bi or an injection drug user, the chance he had HIV is under 1 in a thousand, dropping your risk to something like one chance in 10 million. I trust you'll agree that's zero for all practical purposes.

For these reasons, in general STD testing is not recommended after a single exposure of this sort, unless the partner is known to have a particular infection, or if symptoms develop. That said, many people in your situation are more reassured by negative testing than professional opinion, no matter how expert and science-based (as we strive to be on this forum). If you'll sleep better with negative testing, the main test of importance is a throat swab for gonorrhea and chlamydia. (Chlamydia testing actually isn't necessary and most experts would recommend against it, except that gonorrhea testing automatically includes chlamydia.) That test is valid any time more than 3-4 days after exposure, so you can do it pretty much any time you wish. The only other tests you might consider are blood tests for syphilis and HIV, the results of which are conclusive 6 weeks or more after exposure.

I hope these comments are helpful. Let me know if anything isn't clear.

HHH, MD
---
---
Avatar photo
71 months ago
Hello again, doctor and thank you for your quick reply. I do want to clarify after reading your response, that the episode included fellatio and genital to genital contact (the genital rubbing I mentioned before). If this wasn’t clear in my initial response, I do apologize. Does this change your initial assessment? Do you still feel that my risks are so low, that there in no need for further testing? This was not something I engage in, ever, as I was in a monogamous relationship for 10 years prior to this incident. 

The man I engaged in these acts with is a white male, aged 30, and heterosexual, unknown sexual history. 
Avatar photo
H. Hunter Handsfield, MD
71 months ago
Thanks for the greater detail, but I understood that "rubbing" probably meant genital contact without penetration. My opening comment says transmission occurs "rarely" with such contact. For some STDs -- those transmitted primarily through genital fluids (gonorrhea, chlamydia, HIV, viral hepatitis) -- the risk is zero or close to it. It's higher for those transmitted by skin-skin contact (HPV, herpes, syphilis) but still low for these. There is almost no chance a partner like you describe has syphilis (or HIV); if you acquired herpes you probably would know it by symptoms, hence no need for testing; and as a sexually active person, you have had HPV (whether or not ever diagnsoed) and will be exposed to and probably ifnected with HPV again and this contact does not materially raise that chance.

For those reasons, these comments do not alter my advice above. Does that help clarify things?
---
Avatar photo
71 months ago
Thank you, doctor, your clarification certainly did help. I’m sure my final follow up question is my anxiety getting the best of me, but I have to ask for peace of mind. Is there any chance if there was an exposure to any std (syphilis, hiv, gonnerhea, chlamydia) of passing it along to someone else but use of sharing tooth brushes. (I understand that’s gross) but I must ask. Thank you so much. So if I have been exposed to an std, can someone else acquire it if they accidentally used my toothbrush? 
Avatar photo
H. Hunter Handsfield, MD
71 months ago
No, there is no risk of transmitting through shared toothbrushes, or such low risk it can be ignored.

That concludes two follow-up comments and replies included with each question and so ends this thread.

All your questions, the overall tone of all you have said, and especially this question suggest you may have OCD and germophobia. If fears of contagion (for STDs or anything else) dominate your thinking and/or are interfering with your life and happiness, please seek professional counseling, which I suggest from compassion, not criticism. Germophobia can be an early sign of serious mental health disability (see The Aviator, the film biogrpahy of Howard Hughes, for an excellent example) (and a great movie by the way, with Leonardo DiCaprio and Cate Blanchett).

As a reminder, this must be your last forum question about this exposure and your fears about HIV and STD. The forum does not permit repeated questions on the same topic or exposure, and future new questions along these lines will be deleted without reply and without refund of the posting fee. This policy is based on compassion, not criticism, and is designed to reduce temptations to keep paying for questions with obvious answers. In addition, experience shows that continued answers tend to prolong users' anxieties rather than reducing them. Finally, such questions have little educational value for other users, one of the forum's main purposes. Thanks for your understanding.
---