[Question #652] HSV2 Positive - HIV Risk
104 months ago
|
Edward W. Hook M.D.
104 months ago
|
Welcome to our Forum. I will try to help. Despite your diagnosis of HSV-2 (was this made with a blood test? If so, sometimes these so-called "positive" tests are actually falsely positive), your risk for HIV is about zero and not something to worry about. The reasons for this are:
1. It is unlikely your CSW partners had HIV. Even in locations where HIV is common like parts of Sub-Saharan Africa, most CSWs do not have HIV.
2. You used a condom. Condom protected sex is safe sex.
3. HIV is not spread by contact of genital secretions from infected persons getting onto the surface of intact skin of someone who was not infected
4. While you are correct that HSV does increase the risk of getting HIV if exposed, when that occurs the increase in risk for any single exposure is small and in your case, given all the other facts that you mention which suggest that this was a no risk event, your HSV infection is still essentially zero.
5. Your RNA test 9 days after your last exposure was not taken at a time when results are definitive but many infected persons would have positive tests by that time so it is additional, partial evidence that you were not infected.
If you had asked me whether or not you needed testing for HIV related to the exposures you described, I would say no. That is still the case. My advice is to move forward without further concern. If you cannot do that, then I suggest that you get a 4th generation, combination HIV antigen/antibody tests (sometimes called "Duo" tests) 4 weeks after your last exposure of concern. If that test is negative, then I would suggest that you move forward without concern and without a need for additional testing. I hope these comments are helpful. EWH
104 months ago
|
104 months ago
|
Edward W. Hook M.D.
104 months ago
|
I am aware of the study you mention but think that you are taking this information out of context. the study does not change my advice. When the location of HSV infections is known, the large majority of the infections occur at the tip of the penis, not the base which was uncovered by the condom at the time you had sex. Your concerns that you had an outbreak that you were not aware of is small and the fact that your partner was about to start her period is likewise irrelevant.
We consider DUO tests and RNA tests to be definitive at 28 days. While most infections are detectable by 14 days a few are not. Thus the 28 day recommendation. Having said that, as I said earlier, your risk for infection is so low that I would not have tested at all. I think you are worrying entirely too much. EWH
104 months ago
|
104 months ago
|
104 months ago
|
Edward W. Hook M.D.
104 months ago
|
Our Forum guidelines call for no more than three responses to a client. This will be my third, repetitive reply, trying once again to get you to stop you unnecessary concerns. You are playing word games. In science we cannot ever say never or zero risk in the same way that I cannot say you have zero risk of being struck by lightning while reading this reply. Things happen. On the other hand, your risk of infection is so low as to be inconsequential. That is what safe sex means!
By context I mean that as clinicians and scientists evaluating your risk for HIV we evaluate all that you have told us about your partners, about your activities (condom protected), about your initial RNA test results and the statistical risk of infection (1 infection per 1000 sex acts, on average, IF your partner had HIV and IF your sex was unprotected, neither of which was the case for you). The experimental data from the study you cited (which was carried out by friends and colleagues of ours) demonstrated changes in the local immune response and cells which compose that response in persons with HSV and then went on to HYPOTHESIZE about how this might impact risk of HIV transmission. It is of minimal relevance to your situation for the reasons I mentioned above and will not repeat.
Finally, sorry for the typo. I meant to say your risk for HIV, not HSV is essentially zero.
I cannot comment on how likely your HSV blood test result is to be false positive. that is beyond the topic of this thread and I would need more information including the type of test performed and the numerical value of the positive test, both of which effect the probability of false positives.
This will conclude this thread. There will be no further answers. If you have further questions (and I certainly hope you do not) you will need to pay again and start another question. EWH
104 months ago
|