[Question #6624] HIV 4th Generation Test after PEP
14 months ago
|
14 months ago
|
![]() |
Edward W. Hook M.D.
14 months ago
|
Welcome back to the Forum. On this occasion I happened to pick up your question rather than Dr. Handsfield but I reviewed his earlier interactions with you and agree with all that he said, including that I would not have recommended PEP for you. I hope that these replies will help you to move forward. For persons with known exposures to HIV infected persons (unlike your close to not risk event) PEP reduces the likelihood of acquiring HIV by about 80%. Because few people get HIV following PEP there are few data on precisely when testing is conclusive. For that reason virtually all expert sources say that testing at 3 months is recommended for conclusive results. These recommendations may be overly conservative but in the absence of data that is where things stand.
Bottom line, 4 weeks after completion of PEP, while likely to be accurate, is too early to be recommended as conclusive.
In your own case, between the virtually no risk nature of your exposure AND the fact that you took PEP, AND the fact that you have a negative test 4 week test I am confident that you have not acquired HIV from the exposure you describe. If I were you I would not feel the need for further testing but if you are going to follow the recommendations for testing following PEP, you need another test in 4 weeks.
I hope that this information and perspective is helpful. EWH
14 months ago
|
14 months ago
|
![]() |
Edward W. Hook M.D.
14 months ago
|
While I agree with Dr. Handsfield if he said that related to situations following completion of PEP, and we are in agreement for persons who have not taken PEP that a 6 week test is conclusive, as I said above, the official recommendation, which may be conservative, is three months.
1. Yes
2. There is much overlap between the symptoms of the flu and the ARS. That is the reason we rely on the tests.
3. The fingerstick and venous blood tests are held to the same performance standards by the FDA.
thanks for your thanks. I'm please our Forum has been helpful. EWH
14 months ago
|
![]() |
Edward W. Hook M.D.
14 months ago
|
The BASHH guidelines, like those of the CDC which are slightly more conservative coming out for 12 weeks after exposure, are both likely overly conservative and reflect the lack of good data on the timing of failure following unsuccessful PEP. Most official organizations in such situations err on the side of being overly conservative rather than take a chance of being wrong as more data become available.
Given the no risk nature of your exposure, my sincere advice is to put your concerns aside and move forward.
This is my 3rd response. Therefore as per Forum Guidelines, this thread will be closed shortly without further eplies. EWH
14 months ago
|