[Question #7380] Slipped condom
57 months ago
|
57 months ago
|
![]() |
Edward W. Hook M.D.
57 months ago
|
Welcome to the Forum. Thanks for your questions. I'll be glad to provide some facts and figures. In Kuala Lumpur, the majority of persons with HIV are men- only about 11% of HIV infected persons are women. further, in most settings, most commercial sex workers do not have HIV. Finally, if your partner did have untreated HIV, your risk for acquiring her infection would be less than 1 in 1200. In other words, more than 99.9% of exposures to HIV infected women do not lead to HIV infection.
PEP is a personal choice. As mentioned above, the odds of you acquiring HIV are quite low. If you do decide to pursue PEP, the sooner you start it, the better it works. There is no reason to start PEP once a person is 72 hours out from their exposure.
In answer to your specific comments:
57 months ago
|
![]() |
Edward W. Hook M.D.
57 months ago
|
We have had the good fortune to have had no instances in which we know that Forum users have acquired HIV. The has not been our experience in our practices however but the risk for the encounter you describe is quite low.
Dr. Handsfield and I agree on the low risk for infection. There is really no meaning different between less than 1 in 1200 and 1 in 2500 (i.e. 0.08% and 0.04%)
Again, PEP is a personal choice. All medications have costs and side effects. We try to balance risks and benefits. We recommend PEP for persons with exposures to partners with known untreated HIV but again, this is a personal choice. Another strategy is that if you can get your partner tested, you will know if you were exposed or not. If it has been 14 days since your exposure, there is no role for PEP related to the exposure you described.
At 14 days a 4th generation tests vary and will detect approximately half of recent HIV infections, at 28 days, more than 98-99%.
EWH
56 months ago
|
![]() |
Edward W. Hook M.D.
56 months ago
|
Thank you for the follow-up information. I hope that your negative test provides you with the reassurance you need to move forward without continuing concerns.
Your risk for other STIs from the exposure you describe is, statistically slightly higher than your risk for HIV since those infections are far more common than HIV and may occasionally be asymptomatic. Nonetheless your risk is virtually zero, particularly given that you have not developed symptoms (which would have developed seeks ago). I would not be concerned and see no reason for testing of any sort unless your anxiety requires it. If you choose to test, I'm confident the tests will be negative.
Take care. Stay safe. Please don't worry. EWH.
56 months ago
|
![]() |
Edward W. Hook M.D.
56 months ago
|