[Question #8950] Is any STI Testing required after

Avatar photo
37 months ago
This is repeat of prior question but I cut the comment off short accidentally. There has been been no exposure either than hand-genital in a happy ending massage type situation. I am well assured by your team this is a no-exposure situation. I am just very strict to follow your guidelines, she happened to drop down a pop a dry kiss on my penis head while I was drying off. Did not kick or insert. I’m not concerned about HIV but could a dry kiss like that cause other STI. I really don’t see how it could but I prefer to hear it from you. 

Am I safe to have sex with wife and it test following this incident? 

There is never any insertive sex of any kind. 
Avatar photo
H. Hunter Handsfield, MD
37 months ago
Welcome back, but sorry you found it necessary. 

This was indeed an entirely safe event, with no STI risk of any kind. You should not be tested on account of this event and should continue unprotected sex with your wife without worry.

FYI, you didn't need to start a new thread. You can always add a comment in the follow-up pane without another fee. The previous question will be deleted and I will ask the forum administer to reimburse the fee.

Let me know if anything isn't clear.

HHH, MD
---
Avatar photo
37 months ago
You are a life saver Dr Handsfield, there must a be at least 1 mil people out there wanting to buy you a beer….!  

Just for my education, taking into consideration the low - but NOT true zero risk of STI transmission (excluding HIV) of receiving oral sex from a woman, what is the basic rule to live by - just don’t do it? 

You assure me  a kiss on the pecker is of no concern, good to know. At what point would you tell a guy “hey, you need to get a test before you —— (what?  kiss, orally pleasure, insert no condom) with your wife? (On basis of never putting her at medical
risk, all social issues aside. ) 

Does time duration of the insert or other “logistics” (saliva, etc) matter in this? Is it your oft used metaphor  “meteor from the sky” level of risk, or more like crossing a 6-lane boulevard kinda risky? 

There is just no one really other than you and Dr Hook who can reliably  explain these details…




Avatar photo
H. Hunter Handsfield, MD
37 months ago
"...basic rule to live by - just don't do it?" No, that's not my advice. From an HIV perspective, I see no reason to not receive BJs from time to time. Some STIs are higher risk, however.

There are no rigid guidelines on test frequency. If you only have massages with hand-genital happy endings, and no oral sex or intercourse, I see no need to ever be tested for HIV or any STI, and you could continue to have regular sex with your wife.

Thanks for the thanks -- but there are plenty of excellent experts on STIs! Admittedly, however, online expertise is scant.
---
Avatar photo
37 months ago
Thank you.

 I guess I’m trying to know from an all inclusive STI standpoint, gonorrhea especially, what specifically oral behaviors are “no risk” vs “small risk”.  The first part of my question (poorly typed, I hope this was clear) was that the woman only put a quick kiss on my penis. You dismissed that as not requiring any STI testing. If she had taken me into her mouth for any duration, would you have advised differently?  

This is what I am trying to determine,  as the ease with which oral sex is offered in Bangkok is really extreme. While medically the non-HIV STI’s are less fearsome, they are still trouble not worth having.  You have told the community countless times that all hand-to-genital, kissing (except for Covid I guess) and other non-insertive sex (even cunnilingus it seems) is safe enough not to warrant withdrawal and testing. That is very important to know. (Though you do advise periodic testing nonetheless - I read your responses very carefully.) 

Can gonorrhea (or other nasties like this) transfer from a mere quick lick,  a dry kiss we’ve ruled out I guess (because no saliva? Is that where the pathogens are?); does it really require prolonged (minutes etc) fellatio before it even crosses from “no-risk” (equalling “no-test required”) to the “low risk” threshold (which then somehow seems requiring testing)? 

I’m asking hyper specifically, sorry if this is tedious, but it’s a reality I need to understand to live without fear of triggering a medical (thus social / marital) crisis. Having to hold off sexual contact until tests come in is very psychologically hard and treacherous to do…I want to stay out of that situation. Obviously,  “just-don’t-do-it” is one easy answer, but there are deep reasons why guys need to do this…very long term marriages - mine and most any I know of - seldom have high functioning sexuality despite being very loving and intimate in other aspects)….it’s a real problem for healthy fit testosterone-normal guys in their 50’s, 60’s and beyond. We are not much less horny at this age than at 20 or 30. The wife meanwhile is satisfied with 1 or 2 times a month. That’s just not how men’s bodies function. 

So I’m reaching for some further advice from you. 

Thanks again, of you can tolerate my persistence here.  



 
Avatar photo
H. Hunter Handsfield, MD
37 months ago
I'm sorry, I don't think there are any more detailed data available beyond what we have already discussed. If you want truly zero risk for any and all STIs, you need to have no physical contact with another person; or at most, maybe hand-genital contact only. Beyond that, there are no guarantees. However, some infections are sufficiently low risk with other exposures (e.g. unprotected oral sex) that it probably makes sense to continue them, without expecting truly zero risk. But that's up to you. There are over 20 common STIs; I have neither the time nor energy to address them all individually.

It is exceedingly unlikely but perhaps not zero risk that gonorrhea could be transmitted by the very brief contact you describe.

That will have to conclude this thread. I hope the discussion has been helpful. My last request is that you not return to the forum to discuss risks with each and every exposure. You know enough now, from our various discussions, to make your own judgment. If in doubt, get tested.

Thanks for your understanding. Best wishes and stay safe.
---
Avatar photo
37 months ago
Dr Handsfield,

Possible I could receive your comment on my last part here? 

I can try to better organize my points:

1) as regards non-HIV STI’s, (gonorrhea etc) what is the safe limit for oral transfer avoidance physically speaking,  though some low level oral contact occurs, (if such can even be stated scientifically?) 

 I’m asking this along same lines as advice on kissing or hand-genital contact. These both you and your colleague assure are not STI transfer behaviors. Full stop. So I know I can do that and not worry. This is hugely important information. 

(2) In case of “oral sex” … there is a lot of leeway here on what that is. A typical blow job, yes, we all know what that is. Should one as a rule test for STI if that occurred?  or, would it be morally acceptable to just move on and forget it lest symptoms arose? BTW Is an asymptomatic man still able to transfer gonorrhea? How does this transfer if asymptomatic? …from semen only? or could even kissing transfer gonorrhea? I’ve no idea. 

(3) In how long time (if asymptotic say)  does one need before having a valid STI test? 

(4) short of the full on BJ… as I mentioned initially; a dry kiss on genitals is SAFE (as you tell me initially), then next on up;  a lick ( on testicles say, not insertive)? ; then I guess there’s rimming to consider (not really happening but just would like to know, women just start doing these things without warning)…where does the line cross from SAFE-DONT WORRY,  to “probably-OK-but-you-should-get-checked and not sex it up with the wife until

I’m understanding that it’s saliva enzymes which render the HIV virus non-virulent. How does this principle apply to the other STIs? Saliva does not disable them fully (yet it’s safe to kiss, which is perplexing)…so is it the urethra that is the vulnerable point for transfer (because no salivary enzyme), whereas penile or scrotal skin is not vulnerable? 

I’m sorry if I’m pushing for a science lesson here beyond this simple format but I can’t think of anyone better to ask than you,  and I would really like to understand this mechanistically (I am a sports trainer so I think in very specific physiological way).  

Would be very helpful to get your breakdown on this. HIV matters are all clear as a bell. The others I’m not so clear. 

I am also just slightly concerned that my typing in first note was so sloppy and ungrammatical when I typed it that you missed my story. The girl kissed (“pecked”, exactly speaking) my dick. There was no insertion whatsoever. You then said “no worries, no test required”… was that clear enough? 

Sorry if I am verbose. 

Await your response. 
Avatar photo
37 months ago
I now see your response. 

It is sufficient, thank you.