[Question #9149] Accuracy of treponemal tests many years later
36 months ago
|
Hi Drs H&H,
Thank you for your time and expertise on this site. You were helpful to me many years ago on MedHelp and I’m very grateful for all the help you provide to so many on this site.
I am female and had an ongoing extramarital relationship with a married acquaintance from 2006-2010 . During this time I performed unprotected fellatio probably around 20 times, and had unprotected vaginal intercourse once. He performed unprotected cunnilingus on me about 3 times. He was the only partner I’d ever had besides my spouse, and I am aware of all of his partners before me (3), including his spouse. He was very low risk as far as I could tell, and he’d only had unprotected sex with his wife and me. Around 2009 I started having some symptoms that at the time I thought might be HSV, but in 2011 I tested negative for both 1 and 2 via westernblot, and he tested positive for 1 and negative for 2 in 2015, at my request. In addition to the HSV testing 2011, I also had RPR and HIV blood tests and urine tests for chlamydia and gonnorhea — all negative. My problems have really started in the last 7 years with being worried about syphilis. I’ve had 2 TPPA tests (non-reactive) and have donated blood 25 times (MHA-TP) with no known issues (my partner was also a regular blood donor for many years, also with no known issues). This past April I was finally able to convince him to get a TPPA test as well, and it too was non-reactive. My deep concern is with symptoms I’m perceiving in my spouse. He’s donated blood for the first time recently (MHA-TP), and no subsequent issues came to light. In the last 14 years I have taken antibiotics (my spouse has not) but I am aware IF there’s been an infection, with the types of tests taken, regardless of antibiotics, they should remain positive for life. I’ve read an awful lot on this forum, MedHelp (although they’re all old posts now), and have done ridiculous amounts of research on NIH, FDA/AABB regulations, medical journal studies, etc. my head tel
36 months ago
|
Please forgive my going over the limit. Here’s the rest of my question: I know all the likelihoods of risk factors, transmission probabilities, testing errors, etc are minimal, but as you can deduce, this rules my life, and it’s no exaggeration that every minuscule thing my spouse has sends me into a tailspin of worry. I’m not even really sure at this point what I’m asking, I suppose confirmation that if a person did indeed acquire syphilis, that unless it was aborted by antibiotics in the first 2 weeks of acquisition, any subsequent treponemal tests would be positive. This is really my only way to gauge whether I’ve ever had it in my life and could have given it to my spouse, thus causing every symptom under the sun. Thank you for you time. I know I need mental help about this.
36 months ago
|
And as you tell nearly everyone on here, I have deep regret over decisions I made and actions I took during that period of my life. I couldn’t live with myself if the things I did caused harm to my spouse. I very much worry about tertiary and neurosyphilis, blindness, paralysis, death, everything. I just want to be free. I thought my partner testing non-reactive would do it, but I’m still struggling with the “what-ifs,” as you say. Thank you again for you time, expertise, and patience.
![]() |
Edward W. Hook M.D.
36 months ago
|
Welcome to our forum. Thanks for your question. I hope that the information that I am about to provide will help you to reduce, if not eliminate your concerns over the potential of having infected your regular partner with syphilis.
Among STI’s syphilis is relatively rare. In addition, during the interval you described, the 1st to 2 decades of the 21st-century, Syphilis was disproportionately common amongst men who have sex with other men and was decidedly unusual amongst heterosexual men and women. From everything you say, your casual partner was low risk and quite unlikely to have syphilis. In addition, syphilis is transmitted only through direct Sexual contact and the exposures you described are unlikely to lead to syphilis transmission. Finally, and most importantly, as you are already aware, when persons acquire syphilis their treponemal blood tests such as the TPPA are positive virtually forever. Given the history that you provide of your own blood transfusions (all transfused blood is checked on every occasion it is donated for syphilis) you can be 100% confident that you have not had syphilis and, therefore, cannot have transmitted it to your husband. The fact that your regular partner has also’ donated blood on regular occasions provides further proof that he has not acquired syphilis from you or anyone else at any time.
I hope the information I provided has been helpful to you. Please don’t worry about the possibility of having it sit for us. Your laboratory test prove that this is not the case. EWH
---
35 months ago
|
Thank you Dr. Hook for responding to my question. I know you’re extremely knowledgeable and a top expert particularly in syphilis, so I’m exceedingly grateful for your assessment. I would like to make a clarification, however I assume it won’t change your comments. When I mentioned my partner, specifically in reference to the regular blood donations, I was referring to what you’ve called my “casual partner,” not my “regular partner,” which would be my spouse. My spouse, a white male, btw, is the one who’s only had a single blood donation, in 2020, and this is the only time his blood has ever been “tested.” I do know the Red Cross in particular tests donations using the reverse algorithm, so assuming no testing failures (he did get notification for where his blood went, so sounded like a successful donation), for all intents and purposes he also had a treponemal test. Additionally, my former casual partner, who I failed to mention is a white male who was in his early 30s at the time of our encounters, is the one who had the non-reactive TPPA test in April, at my request. I feel certain you will tell me that his treponemal test being non-reactive, as the partner who had more previous encounters, further reinforces that he never have syphilis that could transmit to me, and therefore I too never had syphilis to transmit.
To add further context, my casual partner had 2 previous sexual relationships (not including his spouse, a white female), all protected, that occurred roughly 3-6 years before we began our encounters. I believe these 2 partners he had, according to CDC county records available online, were also very low risk (both white females, married, late 20s, both in more rural locations). One thing that plays in my mind is the possibility that he unknowingly caught something (although he has confirmed he never had any symptoms descriptive of syphilis), passed it to his spouse who also had no noticeable symptoms, they both in turn took antibiotics at discordant times and inadvertently ping ponged the infection back and forth, thus causing him to be infectious at the time we were together, well after the time period of his other encounters, and well after he would have been infectious to begin with. I know this is not realistic given everything I know, but I guess I just need to say it out loud to be debunked. I do know this is simply not plausible. Dr. HHH always says, in regards to HIV, that test results always overrule symptoms. As it relates to myriad symptoms I perceive in my spouse which I know are non-specific, but also on the “long list of symptoms,” would you be comfortable making this same statement that my non-reactive treponemal test, my casual partner’s non-reactive treponemal test, and my spouse’s uneventful blood donation overrules any supposed symptoms? I know you’ve said as much already, but thought any additional info or context might be pertinent. Thank you again very much for your thoughts. An aside: if you find yourself someday needing an assistant who also specializes in syphilis, please reach out, I feel like I basically have my PhD. at this point, lol. :)
![]() |
Edward W. Hook M.D.
35 months ago
|
Thanks for the additional information as well as you are thanks. You are correct however, the additional information in no way changes my assessment. If anything, the additional information you have provided further assures me that there is no reason whatsoever to be concerned about Syphilis. Both of the partners who mention, your regular partner and your casual partner have been tested for syphilis in the course of blood donation with highly sensitive treponemal tests and found to be negative. Had they had syphilis the test would have been positive. Further, your “what if” scenario in which Syphilis may have been prevented through use of anabiotic’s taken for another purpose is simply not plausible given the evidence. I urge you to put your concerns regarding Syphilis away.
Regarding the symptoms that you have noticed in your spouse, let me remind you that the purpose of testing is not only to make diagnoses but to rule out diagnoses. Particularly with nonspecific symptoms, it is valuable to have a negative test to rule out certain problems. This is the case for your spouse and his symptoms as far as Syphilis is concerned. Believe your ( and his) test results. Don’t let your own possible guilt lead you astray. It is time to move past any concerns about syphilis you may have. I believe you know this intellectually and hope that my comments will help you to accept this emotionally as well. . EWH
---
35 months ago
|
Thank you, Dr. Hook. If I may, as I have one last opportunity, I’d like to ask some clarifying questions, and a general educational question that I’ve had trouble finding answers to. I appreciate your kindness and patience with my last questions.
1. Although you mention the (assumed) negative blood donation tests specifically as being proof of either not currently having or never having been infected with syphilis, do you extend this same confidence to the non-reactive TPPA tests that both I and my former casual partner had, even though they were done many, many years after exposures? To me, for some reason I feel like the tests done at labs are more legitimate due to their definitive yes/no results than a blood donation test where you only hear back if something’s wrong. You’re not donating to get tested, and they’re not there to provide you with results. So while I know regulated donation collection sites use some of the best tests to ensure a safe blood supply, I do wonder what they allow to go through and what they don’t, especially when there’s an increased need. The FDA’s guidance suggests all true positive donations are discarded, but I don’t feel comfortable relying on this system as a good way to gauge past syphilis infection, although it does help in the larger picture.
2. I’ve seen a lot of confusion and mixed interpretations on this forum about active/current infection vs past infection, so I really want to make sure that it’s clear that my concern isn’t whether I have syphilis now, because I know I don’t, but whether I’ve ever had it in my life, whether I’ve ever transmitted it to my spouse, whether he, not taking antibiotics, has it now (or ever), and what the best way is to show that.
3. For those who do become infected, but abort (early cure) the infection from ever producing symptoms and therefore from ever producing positive blood test results, is this the only instance that one acquires syphilis and never develops a positive treponemal test later, by curing during incubation?
4. As it relates to my situation, if my former casual partner had transmitted it to me, his treponemal test would have been positive or reactive, right? And if I transmitted it to my spouse, my treponemal test also would have been positive or reactive, correct? I’m really not putting as much stock in “successful” blood donations as I am in my and my former casual partner’s non-reactive lab-based TPPA results.
5. Does transmission effectively always equal a positive treponemal test in the transmitter? i.e. you can’t have one without the other, right?
6. Appearance of a chancre means a blood test will definitely be positive, correct?
7. Is syphilis transmissible during incubation?
8. Is it possible for one to transmit during incubation, take antibiotics and cure, yet never develop a positive treponemal test?
9. I’ve read on the Captia EIA insert, under the limitations of the test, that negative results on tests done 10+ years after exposure may not be reliable. I couldn’t find any supporting documentation to their claim. Additionally, in this same insert, it mentions a figure of 85% of past infections being positive for life. These were concerning claims that go against everything that says treponemal tests are positive for life. I do know that different tests have different positivity rates during different stages of the infection. What do you make of this caveat that they have in their test materials?
10. Finally, my educational question: I’ve researched extensively about gumma, a benign manifestation of tertiary syphilis, but have only found information in terms of its existence. I have read one UK-based case study from 2009 that very briefly described gumma presentation and their response to treatment, in the study’s particular patient’s case. I searched this forum and medhelp a lot to find anyone else who’d ever asked about them and never really found anything of substance, so I thought that asking about them may benefit others like myself who seek information about them. My questions regarding them are: what is the process of gumma development? How long do they last? How long can one have gumma? Do they go away without treatment? What’s their life cycle? Does having gumma only occur with “active” syphilis, or can it also occur with latent? Will all blood tests be positive (or reactive) when one has visible gumma? How long can someone have tertiary syphilis for? If one does have tertiary syphilis, can it go back to being latent, or does it eventually progress to death?
Dr. Hook, your help, guidance, and shared knowledge is very much appreciated. As you mentioned, intellectually I feel like I logically know the answers to much of what I’m asking, but unfortunately there is an emotional/mental component to all of this that is excruciatingly difficult to overcome, so I’m thankful to have your responses that I can go back and read when I start to get nervous or worried.
Thank you again for your extensive help - I really hope finally asking about my specific circumstance as opposed to reading about others’ can help me move on. What you provide here is truly a godsend.
![]() |
Edward W. Hook M.D.
35 months ago
|
I’m sorry you remain skeptical about my assessment Related to the fact that you clearly do not have syphilis, a relatively rare disease which you have proven you do not have. Straight to your final follow-up questions:
1. Your skepticism regarding safety measures to keep the American blood supply safe is misplaced. Laboratory test performed on transfuse blood are extraordinarily accurate. Your TPPA results serve to validate the fact that you do not, and never had Syphilis.
2. You’ve been clear. You do not and I’ve never had Syphilis. Based on his negative test results, nor has your spouse.
3. Correct
4. Sigh, correct on both counts. Your concerns about the safety of the blood supply is misplaced.
5. Yes
6. Almost. On rare occasions shaker may appear a day or two before blood test become positive.
7. No
8. No! Syphilis is not transmissible during the incubation period
9. Package insert information is, and expected to be, quite conservative. Your scrutiny of the data on the package insert is irrelevant to your situation.
10. Sigh,, Gumma are very rare manifestations of tertiary syphilis in untreated patients who have been infected for a decade or more. They are space occupying lesions and are always accompanied by reactive blood tests.
This completes his thread which will now be closed. In doing so let me remind you that repetitive, anxiety driven questions are frowned upon and may be closed without a response or return of your posting fee. You do not have syphilis!! You need to move forward. I hope my answers will help you to do this. EWH
---