[Question #9585] unprotected intercourse

Avatar photo
31 months ago
hello, circumcised male here from israel
today i went to discreet mature woman(it seems shes 45+), sort of like an escort (charges alot per hour),
toward the end i lost my erection and she took the condom off then gave me a handjob and then she sat on my penis and we performed unprotected intercourse for about a minute until i told her i dont want to do it
she didnt seem bothered by the fact it was unprotected and even got mad that i wanted to stop
she is a local and has a family (she was talking on the phone with her daughter)
im not sure what to do regarding this incident..should i take anything/do anything..
thanks

Avatar photo
H. Hunter Handsfield, MD
31 months ago
Welcome back to the forum. Thank you for your continued confidence in our services.

In general, we recommend against any STI testing after any single exposure unless the risk is especially high, such as a known infected partner, sex between gay men, and similar situations. The large majority of persons in your situation acquire no infection of any kind. This was a low risk exposure: STIs are infrequent in escorts (expensive female sex workers, usually by appointment), in "mature" women, and those who are sexually "discreet". They generally use condoms, have low risk partners (men like you!), and get tested frequently. Further, most STIs are infrequently transmitted. For example, if a female has HIV, the risk to her male partner from a single episode of unprotected vaginal sex is 1 in 2,500. The risk is higher for other STIs, but still low. Finally, you used a condom; the very brief exposure after the condom was removed (under a minute) further reduces the likelihood of transmitting any infection.

To be clear, the risk of an STI isn't zero, but it's probably in the lighting strike sort of range. So my advice is to just be on the lookout for symptoms, i.e. discharge from your penis or painful urination (which would show up within 10 days) and penile blisters, sores, etc (appearing within a few days for herpes, or up to a month for syphilis). Of course get seen by a doctor or clinic if any of these show up, but it is unlikely they will.

For most persons having occasional non-monogamous sexual exposures, instead of testing after every exposure, the wiser strategy is periodic testing for common and serious STIs (i.e. urine gonorrhea/chlamydia for males, plus blood tests for syphilis and HIV). Every 6-12 months might be about right for you, if this event plus the one in your previous question are typical. Having said that, I understand that some in your situation will be uncomfortable waiting that long, and of course you are free to be tested whenever and however frequently you like. In that event, wait 4-5 days to have a urine gonorrhea/chlamydia test and about 6 weeks after the event for syphilis and HIV tests. (If somehow I were in your situation, I wouldn't be tested at this time.)

I hope these comments are helpful. Let me know if anything isn't clear.

HHH, MD

---
Avatar photo
31 months ago
i see, thanks doc i guess ill keep an eye for symptoms
another thing is regarding the risk for HIV, the fact that she was willing to do unprotected intercourse makes me wonder if she does it often or not, ofc i went to search in google (guilty as charged and some websites said something about pep so i tought id ask you)
regarding your question about whetherthis event and the previous one are typical for  me the answer is no, i was in a sexless relationship for a few years (cultural reason) and im single now.. 
Avatar photo
H. Hunter Handsfield, MD
31 months ago
You're right that an escort's willingness to have unprotected sex raises the risk of STI. On the other hand, re-read the other reasons to believe there is little risk in this case. And a further comment about "mature" and what you mean by the term. In general, the main STIs become increasing rare as women pass age 30, and if your partner is 40 or more, the chance she has a transmissible STI is especially low. Of course there are exceptions. However, if you're going to continue to worry about this, probably it would be better to be tested than to lose sleep over it. It's up to you.---
Avatar photo
31 months ago
i see, well if its a low risk id rather not worry about it too much
thanks again doc!.
Avatar photo
H. Hunter Handsfield, MD
31 months ago
OK, good plan. That completes two follow-up exchanges and concludes this thread. Thanks for the thanks.---